The Constitutional Court of South Africa was established under the interim Constitution of 1993 (Act 200 of 1993) as the apex court on constitutional matters, its authority confirmed by the 1996 Constitution and, following 2013 amendments, extended to make it effectively the highest court in South Africa for all matters. It sits in Johannesburg at Constitution Hill, a site built directly into and beside the former Old Fort Prison complex where both Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela had once been held, a deliberate choice meant to place the new constitutional order physically on top of the apartheid state's own machinery of detention. The Court's first bench was sworn in during February 1995 under founding President Arthur Chaskalson and included Albie Sachs, a former anti-apartheid activist who had lost an arm and the sight in one eye to a car bomb in exile. In its first major judgment that same year, S v Makwanyane and Another (1995), the Court unanimously abolished the death penalty, holding it inconsistent with the new Constitution's right to life and its prohibition on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Facts
Founding YearEstablished under the interim Constitution, effective 27 April 1994; the first bench of judges was sworn in and the Court began sitting in February 1995. Jurisdiction ScopeConstitutional matters; since 2013 amendments, effectively the apex court for all matters in South Africa. 1 Learn More
Constitution Hill: A Court Built Inside a Former Prison
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
South Africa's Constitutional Court did not choose a neutral site. Constitution Hill in Johannesburg is built in and around the Old Fort Prison complex, a nineteenth and twentieth century jail whose Number Four section held Black male prisoners under conditions the post-apartheid government's own heritage documentation describes as deliberately degrading, and whose list of former inmates includes both Mahatma Gandhi, jailed there in 1908 for organizing Indian resistance to discriminatory pass laws, and Nelson Mandela, held there before his 1964 transfer to Robben Island. When the new Constitutional Court needed a permanent home in the years after 1994, the choice to build its courtroom on top of the prison's own awaiting-trial block, incorporating original bricks from the demolished structure directly into the new building's walls, was a deliberate architectural argument: that the constitutional order the Court now protected was built literally on the foundation of what it had replaced, rather than erected somewhere it could pretend that history away. The complex today functions as both a working court and a public heritage site, with the old prison cells preserved and open to visitors alongside the Court's own chamber.
The 1995 Bench That Abolished the Death Penalty
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
The Constitutional Court of South Africa heard its first major case before it had any precedent of its own to rely on, and used it to abolish capital punishment outright. S v Makwanyane and Another (1995) asked whether the death penalty, still on the books and still being carried out at the start of the decade, survived the interim Constitution's new Bill of Rights. The eleven judge bench, sworn in only months earlier under founding President Arthur Chaskalson, answered unanimously that it did not, reasoning through the right to life and the prohibition on cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment together rather than treating either clause alone as decisive, and declining to let public opinion, which polling at the time showed favored keeping the death penalty, override a constitutional right the document placed beyond an ordinary parliamentary majority's reach. Justice Albie Sachs, whose own body carried the physical evidence of apartheid-era political violence after a 1988 car bomb cost him an arm and the sight in one eye, wrote separately to stress that a constitutional court's legitimacy could not be borrowed from precedent it did not yet have; it had to be built, case by case, from the document's own text and values. Makwanyane is still cited today, well beyond South Africa, as one of the clearest judicial statements anywhere that a bill of rights exists precisely to bind a government against what a majority might otherwise prefer.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Decided
The Court's first bench, sworn in February 1995 under founding President Arthur Chaskalson, decided the case unanimously.
In Legal System
South African law is classified in comparative law as a mixed system combining Roman-Dutch civil law, English common law and indigenous customary law, the same classification S v Makwanyane and Another itself already carries.
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.