The Court of Justice of the European Union is the judicial institution of the European Union, based in Luxembourg, comprising the Court of Justice proper and the General Court. It traces its origin to the Court of Justice of the European Coal and Steel Community, established by the 1951 Treaty of Paris and first sitting in 1952, and was renamed and reorganized as European integration deepened through the Treaties of Rome, Maastricht and Lisbon. Its central function is ensuring that EU law is interpreted and applied uniformly across member states, chiefly through the preliminary ruling procedure, in which a national court facing a question of EU law refers it to the CJEU for a binding interpretation before deciding the case itself. Landmark CJEU rulings such as Van Gend en Loos (1963) and Costa v ENEL (1964) established the doctrines of direct effect and the supremacy of EU law over conflicting national law, doctrines found nowhere in the founding treaties' text but built by the Court itself, in a manner comparative lawyers have long compared to the Marshall Court's construction of judicial review in Marbury v Madison.
Facts
Founding Year Jurisdiction ScopeInterpretation and application of European Union law across all EU member states 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The Court of Justice of the European Union is the final interpreter of the Regulation. Its Schrems II ruling (Case C-311/18, 2020) invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield transfer mechanism on the extraterritorial-transfer terms the Regulation itself sets, the clearest example of the Court shaping how the Regulation actually operates.
Held Differently
Civil Law, Legal Systems Why this is disputed. The CJEU is a supranational court whose case law draws heavily on continental civil law method and whose member states are mostly civil law jurisdictions, but EU law itself is often described by comparative scholars as a distinct legal order rather than a member of any single one of the five traditions; the civil law classification here reflects the Court's dominant working method, not a claim that EU law is simply continental civil law.
In the Other Atlases
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.