Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Landmark Cases

Filartiga v Pena-Irala

International and Comparative Law

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Filartiga v Pena-Irala is a 1980 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that founded modern human rights litigation in United States federal courts. The family of a young Paraguayan man who had been tortured to death sued the Paraguayan police official responsible, Americo Norberto Pena-Irala, after discovering he was living in the United States, invoking the centuries old Alien Tort Statute. The court held that the statute grants federal courts jurisdiction to hear civil claims brought by foreign nationals for violations of the law of nations, including official torture, wherever in the world the conduct occurred, because torture by a state official violates a universally recognized norm of international law. The decision opened United States courts to civil suits against individual perpetrators of serious human rights abuses committed abroad and remains the foundational case for Alien Tort Statute litigation.

Cross-Tradition Connections

In Legal System

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.