The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1948 in Paris, drafted by a committee chaired by Eleanor Roosevelt with René Cassin, Charles Malik, P. C. Chang and others contributing across differing legal and philosophical traditions. Its thirty articles set out civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights intended to apply to all people regardless of nation, and it is the founding text of the modern international human rights system, later given binding treaty form through the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, both opened for signature in 1966. The Declaration itself is a General Assembly resolution, not a treaty, and its text was never presented for state ratification; it creates no binding legal obligation by its own force, though many scholars argue parts of it have since become binding through customary international law or through incorporation into national constitutions and binding treaties. Its inclusion here as a code-class instrument reflects its role as a foundational codification of asserted universal legal norms, not a claim that it binds states as law in the way a ratified treaty or an enacted statute does.
Facts
EraAdopted 10 December 1948, Paris 1 Promulgated ByThe United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 217 A 1 Sources
Open Questions (1 open question)
Has the Universal Declaration of Human Rights become binding customary international law?
The Declaration was adopted as a non-binding General Assembly resolution and was never opened for state ratification, so it does not bind states as a treaty does. Many scholars and some international tribunals argue that widespread and consistent state practice treating parts of the Declaration as binding has since elevated at least some of its provisions, such as the prohibitions on torture and slavery, into customary international law, but there is no single authoritative determination of exactly which articles have crossed that threshold and which remain aspirational.
What would resolve this A consensus multilateral determination or a sustained line of consistent international judicial holdings expressly ruling on the customary status of each individual article, which does not currently exist in a single settled form.
Public international lawEncyclopaedia Britannica
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.