Home›Sources›LawAtlas Long-Form Articles, First EditionSourceLawAtlas Long-Form Articles, First EditionInternal System ReferenceReference and ClassificationDevelopingClaims Backed By This Source (505 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0)Claims Backed By This Source (505 claims)This source backs 505 claims across the atlas. As facts: 329 well-attested. As cited relationships: 18 holds, 18 connected. Plus 140 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicArticles, 505 claims: 329 well-attested, 18 holds, 18 connected, 140 general references.Well-attested329Articles395 Organizations, One Ruling: The 2017 Liquidation of Jehovah's Witnesses in RussiaA case to answer: what the first look decides and what it leaves openA chief justice chosen over three senior judgesA Court With No Precedent of Its Own YetA Judgment After Expulsion: The European Court's 2022 Reversal and Its LimitsA Law Passed by Statute, Not Grown by PrecedentA lecture on why rights must be defended: Jhering and The Struggle for LawA monk who collected canon law and carried it into politicsA Rulebook for an Industry With No Single CodeA scholar who catalogued scholars across the legal schoolsA Value Too Vague to Be a RuleA world court whose reach depends on the consent of statesAfter the Verdict: The Contested Tax Dispute Over Tai Ji Men LandAn investiture reformer who took investiture himselfAn office with income and no duties, from church benefice to statuteBriefs, panels and the record: how one Pennsylvania appeals court decidesCamden, the Wilkes case and general warrantsCarnal knowledge: from Biblical euphemism to a statutory element of proofChina's Answer to the GDPR QuestionClaims you could have brought but did notConstitution Hill: A Court Built Inside a Former PrisonEleven Judges, One Value, in the First Great CaseEleven judgments, a 7 to 6 count and the supersession that followed Kesavananda BharatiEscheat: from feudal reversion to bona vacantiaFormal Legality Was Not EnoughFour Freedoms in One PetitionFrance and Germany Agree on the Answer, Not the ReasonFrom a fiction in ejectment to a modern injunction: the working life of John DoeFrom a slaveholding Kentucky Unionist to the Great DissenterFrom a thesis on the equality of states to the World Court: the scholarly path of Pieter KooijmansFrom banishment to the Praetorian Guard: the career of UlpianFrom fief to freehold: how the fee simple came to mean ownershipFrom Kazerun to the bench in Yemen: the career of FiruzabadiFrom royal duty to local self-governance: how the posse comitatus survivedFrom the Chancellor's conscience to the Chancellor's foot: how equity earned its rulesFrom the Chancery bar to The Concept of LawFrom the Rivonia defence team to the Constitutional Court benchFrom Tort to Article 81: The Legal Path to Dissolving the Unification ChurchGifts, Not Tuition: The Legal Reasoning Behind the Tai Ji Men AcquittalGovernment by injunction and the court as supervisorGross indecency: an offence the statutes never definedHalakha: a legal tradition that few classifications know where to putHersch Lauterpacht: scholar, Nuremberg adviser and judge of the World CourtHow a haystack fire made the reasonable person an objective standardHow a king's circuit judges made law common to all EnglandHow a workaround for friars became equitable ownershipHow Australia's highest court became its last wordHow church procedure became the continental criminal trialHow comparative lawyers came to treat unwritten custom as lawHow courts have used jury sequestration, from the Thaw trial to partial isolationShowing 1 to 50 of 111 entities carrying this claim.123Next →Holds18ArticlesA Court With No Precedent of Its Own YetA Law Passed by Statute, Not Grown by PrecedentA Rulebook for an Industry With No Single CodeA Value Too Vague to Be a RuleChina's Answer to the GDPR QuestionEleven Judges, One Value, in the First Great CaseFormal Legality Was Not EnoughFour Freedoms in One PetitionFrance and Germany Agree on the Answer, Not the ReasonMandatory in Two Countries, Voluntary Almost Everywhere ElseParliament Can Do Anything, Except Bind Its SuccessorsThe Case That Outvoted the PollsThe Doctrine Common Law Never Quite BuiltThe Judge Who Told a King NoThe State That Can Be Sued in Its Own CourtsThree Rules, One Constitution: Dicey's Case for the Rule of LawTwo Legal Systems in One StatuteWriting a Court Decision Into StatuteConnected18ArticlesA Court With No Precedent of Its Own YetA Law Passed by Statute, Not Grown by PrecedentA Rulebook for an Industry With No Single CodeA Value Too Vague to Be a RuleChina's Answer to the GDPR QuestionEleven Judges, One Value, in the First Great CaseFormal Legality Was Not EnoughFour Freedoms in One PetitionFrance and Germany Agree on the Answer, Not the ReasonMandatory in Two Countries, Voluntary Almost Everywhere ElseParliament Can Do Anything, Except Bind Its SuccessorsThe Case That Outvoted the PollsThe Doctrine Common Law Never Quite BuiltThe Judge Who Told a King NoThe State That Can Be Sued in Its Own CourtsThree Rules, One Constitution: Dicey's Case for the Rule of LawTwo Legal Systems in One StatuteWriting a Court Decision Into StatuteGeneral References140ArticlesWhen the Supreme Court refused power Congress offered itWhen Twelve People Cannot AgreeWhere a trial ends, where it does not apply, and what each model is criticized forWhere an act of God excuses and where it does notWho bears the risk when a defendant cannot payWho gets through a diversion programWho inherits when there is no will: intestacy across common law and civil lawWhy ninety-nine years: a convention, not a counted limitWhy Rome needed usucaption: the gap between delivery and ownershipWorld Day for International Justice: a date chosen at KampalaWriting a Court Decision Into StatuteShowing 101 to 111 of 111 entities carrying this claim.← Previous123Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.