Home›Sources›LawAtlas Long-Form Articles, First EditionSourceLawAtlas Long-Form Articles, First EditionInternal System ReferenceReference and ClassificationDevelopingClaims Backed By This Source (505 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0)Claims Backed By This Source (505 claims)This source backs 505 claims across the atlas. As facts: 329 well-attested. As cited relationships: 18 holds, 18 connected. Plus 140 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicArticles, 505 claims: 329 well-attested, 18 holds, 18 connected, 140 general references.Well-attested329Articles395 Organizations, One Ruling: The 2017 Liquidation of Jehovah's Witnesses in RussiaA case to answer: what the first look decides and what it leaves openA chief justice chosen over three senior judgesA Court With No Precedent of Its Own YetA Judgment After Expulsion: The European Court's 2022 Reversal and Its LimitsA Law Passed by Statute, Not Grown by PrecedentA lecture on why rights must be defended: Jhering and The Struggle for LawA monk who collected canon law and carried it into politicsA Rulebook for an Industry With No Single CodeA scholar who catalogued scholars across the legal schoolsA Value Too Vague to Be a RuleA world court whose reach depends on the consent of statesAfter the Verdict: The Contested Tax Dispute Over Tai Ji Men LandAn investiture reformer who took investiture himselfAn office with income and no duties, from church benefice to statuteBriefs, panels and the record: how one Pennsylvania appeals court decidesCamden, the Wilkes case and general warrantsCarnal knowledge: from Biblical euphemism to a statutory element of proofChina's Answer to the GDPR QuestionClaims you could have brought but did notConstitution Hill: A Court Built Inside a Former PrisonEleven Judges, One Value, in the First Great CaseEleven judgments, a 7 to 6 count and the supersession that followed Kesavananda BharatiEscheat: from feudal reversion to bona vacantiaFormal Legality Was Not EnoughFour Freedoms in One PetitionFrance and Germany Agree on the Answer, Not the ReasonFrom a fiction in ejectment to a modern injunction: the working life of John DoeFrom a slaveholding Kentucky Unionist to the Great DissenterFrom a thesis on the equality of states to the World Court: the scholarly path of Pieter KooijmansFrom banishment to the Praetorian Guard: the career of UlpianFrom fief to freehold: how the fee simple came to mean ownershipFrom Kazerun to the bench in Yemen: the career of FiruzabadiFrom royal duty to local self-governance: how the posse comitatus survivedFrom the Chancellor's conscience to the Chancellor's foot: how equity earned its rulesFrom the Chancery bar to The Concept of LawFrom the Rivonia defence team to the Constitutional Court benchFrom Tort to Article 81: The Legal Path to Dissolving the Unification ChurchGifts, Not Tuition: The Legal Reasoning Behind the Tai Ji Men AcquittalGovernment by injunction and the court as supervisorGross indecency: an offence the statutes never definedHalakha: a legal tradition that few classifications know where to putHersch Lauterpacht: scholar, Nuremberg adviser and judge of the World CourtHow a haystack fire made the reasonable person an objective standardHow a king's circuit judges made law common to all EnglandHow a workaround for friars became equitable ownershipHow Australia's highest court became its last wordHow church procedure became the continental criminal trialHow comparative lawyers came to treat unwritten custom as lawHow courts have used jury sequestration, from the Thaw trial to partial isolationShowing 1 to 50 of 111 entities carrying this claim.123Next →Holds18ArticlesA Court With No Precedent of Its Own YetA Law Passed by Statute, Not Grown by PrecedentA Rulebook for an Industry With No Single CodeA Value Too Vague to Be a RuleChina's Answer to the GDPR QuestionEleven Judges, One Value, in the First Great CaseFormal Legality Was Not EnoughFour Freedoms in One PetitionFrance and Germany Agree on the Answer, Not the ReasonMandatory in Two Countries, Voluntary Almost Everywhere ElseParliament Can Do Anything, Except Bind Its SuccessorsThe Case That Outvoted the PollsThe Doctrine Common Law Never Quite BuiltThe Judge Who Told a King NoThe State That Can Be Sued in Its Own CourtsThree Rules, One Constitution: Dicey's Case for the Rule of LawTwo Legal Systems in One StatuteWriting a Court Decision Into StatuteConnected18ArticlesA Court With No Precedent of Its Own YetA Law Passed by Statute, Not Grown by PrecedentA Rulebook for an Industry With No Single CodeA Value Too Vague to Be a RuleChina's Answer to the GDPR QuestionEleven Judges, One Value, in the First Great CaseFormal Legality Was Not EnoughFour Freedoms in One PetitionFrance and Germany Agree on the Answer, Not the ReasonMandatory in Two Countries, Voluntary Almost Everywhere ElseParliament Can Do Anything, Except Bind Its SuccessorsThe Case That Outvoted the PollsThe Doctrine Common Law Never Quite BuiltThe Judge Who Told a King NoThe State That Can Be Sued in Its Own CourtsThree Rules, One Constitution: Dicey's Case for the Rule of LawTwo Legal Systems in One StatuteWriting a Court Decision Into StatuteGeneral References140ArticlesHow empty land became a legal fiction: the long argument over terra nulliusHow national judges bring EU law questions to LuxembourgHow the adversarial system learned to welcome lawyersHow the Supreme Court decides what counts as a bill of attainderHow the writ system limited the rights a plaintiff could claimHow Tribonian built the Corpus Juris Civilis in stagesHow usufruct splits the bundle of ownershipHow Vattel's Law of Nations reached the American foundersInterpreting the Constitution: the quiet work of Albania's Constitutional CourtIs property a right to exclude or a bundle of rights?Joseph Story and the case for one national lawLaw as the command of a sovereign: Austin and the command theoryMandatory in Two Countries, Voluntary Almost Everywhere ElseMore than a trial court: the review role of the King County Superior CourtOne phrase, many rules: how courts treat the thing that speaks for itselfParliament Can Do Anything, Except Bind Its SuccessorsPlessy v Ferguson: a test case planned from the first railway seatQisas, hudud and diyya: three paths to a death sentence in Islamic lawQui tam: from the Statute of York to the False Claims ActSavigny against a unified German codeScrutinizing the two Sahihs: al-Daraqutni's Kitab al-tatabbu'Secret databases and the right to dispute: what the Fair Credit Reporting Act promised consumersSubrogation: stepping into another party's position, and why it stops thereThe 17 July rule: a fixed date tied to a treatyThe 1995 Bench That Abolished the Death PenaltyThe Case That Outvoted the PollsThe constitutional court Kelsen designed and the guardian of the constitutionThe Doctrine Common Law Never Quite BuiltThe duty of undivided loyalty and where jurisdictions differThe Judge Who Told a King NoThe jurist Roman law students were named afterThe Longest Alternative: Inside South Korea's 36 Month Civilian Service ProgramThe Margin That Keeps NarrowingThe Paperwork That Was Supposed to Set Them FreeThe prison Bentham never got to buildThe Promise That Got the Constitution RatifiedThe State That Can Be Sued in Its Own CourtsThe Warrant That Had No Law Behind ItThree Rules, One Constitution: Dicey's Case for the Rule of LawTrue dominion and the limits of papal and imperial power in Vitoria's De IndisTwo Clauses, One Ruling: How the Constitutional Court of Korea Split Conscience from PunishmentTwo kinds of defiance and the power to punish themTwo layers of tribal sovereignty: the Marshall Trilogy and congressional plenary powerTwo Legal Systems in One StatuteUnpaid, unlearned and still constitutional: the lay magistrate on trialWhat Dissolution Actually Does: Corporate Status, Not Religious FreedomWhen a coroner's jury could accuse a suspectWhen a finding of guilt is not the same as being convictedWhen a passing remark becomes lawWhen death ends a conviction: abatement ab initio in practiceShowing 51 to 100 of 111 entities carrying this claim.← Previous123Next →Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.