Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Regulations

Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA)

Data Privacy and Protection Law

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, or BIPA, is a law enacted October 3, 2008 in the U.S. state of Illinois to regulate the collection, use and handling of biometric identifiers and biometric information by private entities; it does not apply to government entities. Illinois, Texas and Washington are the only states with comparable biometric privacy statutes, but BIPA is regarded as the most stringent, prescribing damages of one thousand dollars per violation, or five thousand dollars per violation where the violation is intentional or reckless. That damages provision has made BIPA the basis for numerous class action lawsuits.

Facts
EraSourced to the subject's own account
Enacted October 3, 2008. 1
Promulgated BySourced to the subject's own account
Illinois General Assembly. 1
Jurisdiction ScopeSourced to the subject's own account
U.S. state of Illinois; applies to private entities, not government entities. 1
Regulatory DomainSourced to the subject's own account
Collection, use and handling of biometric identifiers and biometric information. 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

In Legal System

United States state statute, within the common law tradition.

Source Major Legal Systems in the World TodayRene David and John E.C. Brierley
Sources
1. Biometric Information Privacy Act (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead paragraph (era)
Quote, Lead paragraph (era)
The Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) is a law set forth on October 3, 2008 in the U.S. state of Illinois, in an effort to regulate the collection, use, and handling of biometric identifiers and information by private entities. Notably, the Act does not apply to government entities. While Texas and Washington are the only other states that implemented similar biometric protections, BIPA is the most stringent. The Act prescribes $1,000 per violation, and $5,000 per violation if the violation is intentional or reckless. Because of this damages provision, the BIPA has spawned several class action lawsuits.
View the Source
1. Biometric Information Privacy Act (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead paragraph (promulgated-by)
Quote, Lead paragraph (promulgated-by)
The Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) is a law set forth on October 3, 2008 in the U.S. state of Illinois, in an effort to regulate the collection, use, and handling of biometric identifiers and information by private entities. Notably, the Act does not apply to government entities. While Texas and Washington are the only other states that implemented similar biometric protections, BIPA is the most stringent. The Act prescribes $1,000 per violation, and $5,000 per violation if the violation is intentional or reckless. Because of this damages provision, the BIPA has spawned several class action lawsuits.
View the Source
1. Biometric Information Privacy Act (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead paragraph (jurisdiction-scope)
Quote, Lead paragraph (jurisdiction-scope)
The Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) is a law set forth on October 3, 2008 in the U.S. state of Illinois, in an effort to regulate the collection, use, and handling of biometric identifiers and information by private entities. Notably, the Act does not apply to government entities. While Texas and Washington are the only other states that implemented similar biometric protections, BIPA is the most stringent. The Act prescribes $1,000 per violation, and $5,000 per violation if the violation is intentional or reckless. Because of this damages provision, the BIPA has spawned several class action lawsuits.
View the Source
1. Biometric Information Privacy Act (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead paragraph (regulatory-domain)
Quote, Lead paragraph (regulatory-domain)
The Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) is a law set forth on October 3, 2008 in the U.S. state of Illinois, in an effort to regulate the collection, use, and handling of biometric identifiers and information by private entities. Notably, the Act does not apply to government entities. While Texas and Washington are the only other states that implemented similar biometric protections, BIPA is the most stringent. The Act prescribes $1,000 per violation, and $5,000 per violation if the violation is intentional or reckless. Because of this damages provision, the BIPA has spawned several class action lawsuits.
View the Source
Major Legal Systems in the World Today
Rene David and John E.C. Brierley, Stevens and Sons, 1985In Legal System: Law of the United States
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.