Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District is a 1969 decision of the United States Supreme Court that established the free speech rights of public school students. Several students, including Mary Beth Tinker, were suspended from their Iowa public schools for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, and their families sued arguing this violated their right to free expression. The Court held that students do not shed their constitutional right to freedom of speech at the schoolhouse gate, and that school officials may restrict student expression only when they can reasonably forecast that it will substantially and materially disrupt the operation of the school, not merely because they wish to avoid the discomfort of an unpopular viewpoint. The decision remains the leading standard for evaluating restrictions on student speech in American public schools.
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingTinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that recognized the First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Decided By
In Legal System
Sources
1. Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia infobox, Decided fieldQuote, Wikipedia infobox, Decided field
Decided February 24, 1969
View the Source 1. Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)Quote, Wikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)
Decided February 24, 1969
View the Source 1. Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia lead paragraph, first sentenceQuote, Wikipedia lead paragraph, first sentence
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that recognized the First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.