Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Landmark Cases

R v Dudley and Stephens

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

R v Dudley and Stephens, decided by the Queen's Bench Division of the English High Court in 1884, is the leading English authority that necessity is no defense to a charge of murder. The crew of the yacht Mignonette, adrift in a lifeboat after their ship sank, killed and ate the weakest member of their party, a seventeen year old cabin boy named Richard Parker, after roughly three weeks without food and eight days without water; the survivors were rescued and, on returning to England, prosecuted for murder rather than treated as having acted from unavoidable necessity, which was the custom among some sailors of the period. The court, in a specially constituted five judge panel led by Lord Chief Justice Coleridge, held that no necessity, however extreme, justifies the deliberate killing of an innocent person to preserve one's own life, rejecting the argument that Dudley and Stephens had simply chosen who would die when someone had to. Both men were convicted of murder and sentenced to death, though the sentence was commuted by the Crown to six months' imprisonment, an outcome widely read as the legal system stating an absolute principle while quietly tempering its human cost.

Facts
Decision Year
1884 1
Holding
Held that necessity, including the necessity of survival, is not a defense to a charge of murder, and that deliberately killing an innocent person to preserve one's own life is murder regardless of the extremity of the circumstances. 1
Current Status
Standing precedent in English law and widely taught across common law jurisdictions as the leading case on necessity and murder. 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Mens Rea, Doctrines

R v Dudley and Stephens held that extreme necessity is no defense to an intentional killing, a foundational limit on excusing a culpable mental state that mens rea doctrine otherwise requires the prosecution to prove.

In Legal System

Source An Introduction to Comparative LawKonrad Zweigert and Hein Koetz; English translation by Tony Weir
Sources
1. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law
Mathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann, editors, Oxford University Press, 2006
An Introduction to Comparative Law
Konrad Zweigert and Hein Koetz; English translation by Tony Weir, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998In Legal System: Common Law
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.