This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Five years after Russia's Supreme Court ordered the Jehovah's Witnesses liquidated, a different court reached the opposite conclusion, and arrived too late to matter in the way such rulings usually do.
On June 7, 2022, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia, a case joining the original Taganrog local religious organization's application with nineteen others, that the 2017 liquidation, the seizure of Jehovah's Witnesses property, and the accompanying publication bans were unlawful. The court found violations of the rights to freedom of religion, expression and association under the European Convention on Human Rights, and it did not stop at declaring the violation: it called on Russia to discontinue pending criminal proceedings against Jehovah's Witnesses and to release those already imprisoned under the ban.
The timing is what makes the judgment unusual. Russia was expelled from the Council of Europe in March 2022, months before the Taganrog LRO judgment came down, and formally ceased being a party to the European Convention on Human Rights that September. A ruling ordinarily backed by treaty membership and the prospect of continued engagement with the Council of Europe's enforcement machinery arrived instead addressed to a state that had already left the system built to enforce it. Russia has not reversed the domestic liquidation, and criminal prosecutions of individual Jehovah's Witnesses under Article 282.2 of the Criminal Code continued after the judgment, not before it.
The result is two rulings that both remain formally true at once inside their own systems: a domestic liquidation Russia still treats as final and enforced, and an international judgment finding that same liquidation unlawful, with no shared authority left standing to reconcile the two.