Immigration and Naturalization Service v Chadha is a 1983 decision of the United States Supreme Court that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional. Federal immigration law allowed either single house of Congress to override an executive branch decision, made through the Immigration and Naturalization Service, to suspend the deportation of a named individual, in this case Jagdish Rai Chadha. The Court held that this one-house legislative veto was legislative in effect because it altered the legal rights of a person outside the legislative branch, and so had to satisfy the Constitutions requirements of passage by both houses of Congress and presentment to the President, which it did not. The ruling invalidated the legislative veto provisions embedded in dozens of other federal statutes and remains a central case on the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch.
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingImmigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the one-house legislative veto violated the constitutional separation of powers. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Decided By
In Legal System
Sources
1. Immigration and Naturalization Service v Chadha (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia infobox, Decided fieldQuote, Wikipedia infobox, Decided field
Decided June 23, 1983
View the Source 1. Immigration and Naturalization Service v Chadha (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)Quote, Wikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)
Decided June 23, 1983
View the Source 1. Immigration and Naturalization Service v Chadha (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia lead paragraph, first sentenceQuote, Wikipedia lead paragraph, first sentence
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the one-house legislative veto violated the constitutional separation of powers.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.