Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Landmark Cases

Entick v Carrington

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Entick v Carrington ([1765] EWHC KB J98; (1765) 19 Howell's State Trials 1029; 95 ER 807) is an English case decided on 2 November 1765 by the Court of Common Pleas under Lord Chief Justice Camden. King's messengers acting under a warrant from the Secretary of State had broken into the home of the writer John Entick and seized his papers while searching for the author of pamphlets critical of the Crown. Entick sued for trespass, and Camden CJ held that no statute or precedent authorized the warrant, so the officers had committed an unlawful trespass. The case is a foundation of English constitutional law for subjecting executive power to the ordinary law and directly influenced the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Facts
Decision Year
1765 1
Decision Date
1765-11-02 1
Holding
Held that the Secretary of State's warrant authorizing the search of Entick's home and seizure of his papers had no basis in statute or precedent, so the King's messengers who executed it were liable for trespass; by the laws of England, every invasion of private property, be it ever so minute, is a trespass, and the silence of the books on any excuse is an authority against the defendant. 1
Current Status
Foundational and undisturbed; its holding that executive officials may act only within powers granted by statute or precedent, never merely because no law forbids the act, remains a cornerstone of English constitutional law and directly shaped the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Rule of Law, Doctrines

Entick v Carrington is a foundational English rule-of-law case: it holds that executive officials may act only within powers granted by law.

In Legal System

Sources
1. Entick v Carrington (Wikipedia)
Judgment section
Quote, Judgment section
By the laws of England, every invasion of private property, be it ever so minute, is a trespass...If no excuse can be found or produced, the silence of the books is an authority against the defendant.
1. Entick v Carrington (Wikipedia)
Legal significance section
1. Entick v Carrington (Wikipedia)
Infobox
1. Entick v Carrington (Wikipedia)
In Legal System: English Law
1. Entick v Carrington (Wikipedia)
In Category: Landmark Cases
1. Entick v Carrington (Wikipedia)
Associated With: Rule of Law
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.