Citizens United v Federal Election Commission is a 2010 decision of the United States Supreme Court on the free speech rights of corporations in political campaigns. The nonprofit corporation Citizens United sought to broadcast and advertise a film critical of a presidential candidate close to a primary election, which federal campaign finance law restricted as a corporate funded electioneering communication. The Court held by a five to four majority that the First Amendment bars the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations, labor unions and other associations, because political speech does not lose constitutional protection simply because its speaker is a corporate entity. The decision struck down key restrictions on independent campaign spending and remains one of the most consequential and debated First Amendment rulings in modern American law.
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingCitizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ruling that certain campaign finance restrictions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The court struck down Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited "electioneering communications" paid for by corporations, labor unions, and other organizations. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Decided By
In Legal System
Sources
1. Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia infobox, Decided fieldQuote, Wikipedia infobox, Decided field
Decided January 21, 2010
View the Source 1. Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)Quote, Wikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)
Decided January 21, 2010
View the Source 1. Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia lead paragraphQuote, Wikipedia lead paragraph
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States ruling that certain campaign finance restrictions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The court struck down Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which prohibited "electioneering communications" paid for by corporations, labor unions, and other organizations.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.