Barrios Altos v Peru was a 2001 decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights holding that Peru's amnesty laws, which had shielded members of the security forces from prosecution for a 1991 massacre of fifteen people carried out by an army death squad in the Barrios Altos neighborhood of Lima, were incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights and lacked legal effect, because amnesty provisions that prevent the investigation and punishment of serious human rights violations are impermissible. The ruling became a leading precedent across Latin America against self amnesty laws that shield state actors from accountability for atrocities.
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingAmnesty Laws No. 26479 and No. 26492 are incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, lack legal effect. 2 Connections
Decided By
Decided by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, 2001.
In Legal System
Source Central Intelligence Agency: Peru, The World Factbook (factbook.json archive copy)
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Sources
1. Barrios Altos massacre (Wikipedia)
Inter-American Court of Human Rights section, year
the court made its judgment of 14 March 2001, finding that the government was in the wrong and ordering compensation be paid to the victims.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights section, date
the court made its judgment of 14 March 2001
View the Source2. Case of Barrios Altos, Judgment (Inter-American Court of Human Rights)
Operative paragraph 4Quote, Operative paragraph 4
Amnesty Laws No. 26479 and No. 26492 are incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights and, consequently, lack legal effect.
View the Source Central Intelligence Agency: Peru, The World Factbook (factbook.json archive copy)
Central Intelligence AgencyIn Legal System: Law of Peru, Government, Legal systemQuote, In Legal System: Law of Peru, Government, Legal system
civil law system
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.