Decisions on discrimination by sexual orientation or sex: the decriminalisation of same-sex relations in India, the South African, Brazilian and American cases on same-sex marriage and the Indian Vishaka guidelines on sexual harassment at work. A case belongs here when its cited article describes it as a decision on sexual orientation, marriage equality or sex discrimination. It excludes cases on race.
Browse By
Sexual Orientation, Marriage and Workplace Equality Cases
Filter Results4 entries
Sources
ADI 4277 and ADPF 132 (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: ADPF 132 and ADI 4277 (Brazil), Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: ADPF 132 and ADI 4277 (Brazil), Introduction, sentence 1
ADI 4277 and ADPF 132 (May 5, 2011) are landmark Brazil Supreme Court cases related to the recognition of same-sex civil unions.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, Introduction, sentences 1-3Quote, Has Member: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex.
Obergefell v Hodges (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: Obergefell v Hodges, Introduction, sentences 1-3Quote, Has Member: Obergefell v Hodges, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) ( OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia contributorsHas Member: Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie, IntroductionQuote, Has Member: Minister of Home Affairs v Fourie, Introduction
is a landmark decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which the court ruled unanimously that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.