Decisions on the fairness and limits of criminal liability: the American right to appointed counsel in Gideon and the English lifeboat case of Dudley and Stephens that refused necessity as a defence to murder. A case belongs here when its cited article describes it as a decision on counsel or on a general defence to crime. It excludes police power cases. The group joins two decisions that define the limits of liability and fairness at trial and that are usually taught together in a first course on criminal law.
Browse By
Right to Counsel and Necessity Cases
Filter Results2 entries
Sources
R v Dudley and Stephens (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: R v Dudley and Stephens, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: R v Dudley and Stephens, Introduction, sentence 1
R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273, DC is a leading English criminal case which established a precedent throughout the common law world that necessity is not a defence to a charge of murder.
View the Source Gideon v Wainwright (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: Gideon v Wainwright, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Gideon v Wainwright, Introduction, sentence 1
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.