Origin Established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984).
Inevitable discovery is a doctrine in United States criminal procedure that permits illegally obtained evidence to be admitted at trial if the prosecution shows it would have been discovered through lawful means regardless. The Supreme Court formally adopted the doctrine in Nix v. Williams in 1984, a case in which police had violated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of a defendant to learn where a murder victim was hidden, but the Court allowed the evidence because an ongoing search of the area would inevitably have found the body anyway. The prosecution must prove inevitable discovery only by a preponderance of the evidence, and the Court specifically declined to require any showing of police good faith, focusing instead on whether lawful investigation would eventually have reached the same evidence. The doctrine is meant to place police in the position they would have occupied had they followed proper procedure, balancing the deterrent purpose of the exclusionary rule against letting a guilty defendant escape justice over evidence that lawful methods would have produced regardless.
Facts
Origin PeriodEstablished by the U.S. Supreme Court in Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984). 1 Core PrincipleEvidence found during an unlawful search remains admissible if the prosecution shows it would inevitably have been discovered anyway through an independent line of investigation already underway. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The inevitable discovery doctrine is a named exception narrowing the exclusionary rule.
In Legal System
U.S. criminal procedure exception admitting evidence that would have been discovered lawfully regardless of an earlier illegal search.
Sources
1. Exclusionary Rule (Cornell LII Wex)
Cornell Law School Legal Information InstituteCornell LII Wex, Exclusionary Rule entry, inevitable discovery doctrine subsectionQuote, Cornell LII Wex, Exclusionary Rule entry, inevitable discovery doctrine subsection
The inevitable discovery doctrine allows admission of evidence that was discovered in an unlawful search or seizure if it would have be discovered in the same condition anyway, by an independent line of investigation that was already being pursued when the unlawful search or seizure occurred.
View the Source 1. Exclusionary Rule (Cornell LII Wex)
Cornell Law School Legal Information InstituteCornell LII Wex, Exclusionary Rule entry, discussion of Nix v. WilliamsView the Source Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.