Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Doctrines

Eggshell Skull Rule

Tort and Equity Doctrine

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The eggshell skull rule, also called the thin skull rule, is a principle of common law tort systems holding that a defendant is fully liable for the harm actually caused to a victim even if the unusual physical frailty or pre-existing condition of the victim made the resulting injury far worse than it would have been for an ordinary person. The rule applies across negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability, and courts have extended its logic beyond physical vulnerability to psychological, social, and even economic characteristics of a victim that increase the severity of an injury. Its rationale is that a wrongdoer should not escape responsibility for the actual harm caused merely because the extent of that harm was not foreseeable, since the wrongdoer takes the victim as found. The main limitation of the rule involves intervening causes: an independent later event, such as negligent medical treatment, can break the chain of causation and limit the liability of the original defendant for everything that follows.

Facts
Core Principle
A defendant remains fully liable for the actual extent of a plaintiff's injuries even when an unusual, unforeseeable vulnerability made the harm worse than it would have been for an ordinary person. 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

In Legal System

Common law tort rule holding a defendant liable for the full extent of a victim's injury even if unusually severe due to a pre-existing condition.

Sources
1. Eggshell Skull Rule (Cornell LII Wex)
Cornell Law School Legal Information InstituteCornell LII Wex, Eggshell Skull Rule entry, opening definitional sentence
Quote, Cornell LII Wex, Eggshell Skull Rule entry, opening definitional sentence
The eggshell skull rule, also called the thin skull rule, is a common law doctrine that holds a defendant liable for the full extent of a plaintiff's unforeseeable and uncommon reactions to the defendant's negligent or intentional tort.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.