Comparative responsibility, known as comparative fault in some jurisdictions, is a doctrine of tort law that compares the fault of each party in a lawsuit for a single injury. It may apply to intentional torts as well as negligence and encompasses the doctrine of comparative negligence. The fault is divided among the parties by percentages, and the money awarded to the plaintiff is divided accordingly, so that a plaintiff found to be 25 percent at fault can recover only 75 percent of his damages. The doctrine becomes intricate when the plaintiff shares in the fault, when a defendant who has a share of the fault cannot be included in the suit, when one of the defendants cannot pay, and when charges of both negligence and intentional torts appear in the same action.
Facts
Classification
Doctrine Category Connections
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Comparative responsibility
a doctrine of tort law that compares the fault of each party in a lawsuit for a single injuryView the Source 2. Comparative responsibility (Wikipedia)
Lead
Comparative responsibility (known as comparative fault in some jurisdictions) is a doctrine of tort law that compares the fault of each party in a lawsuit for a single injury.
In Group: Negligence and Duty of Care Doctrines, Introduction, sentence 1
Comparative responsibility (known as comparative fault in some jurisdictions) is a doctrine of tort law that compares the fault of each party in a lawsuit for a single injury.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.