Origin 1984, in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.; overruled 2024 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
Chevron deference, named for the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., was a doctrine of US administrative law requiring federal courts to defer to a government agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute the agency administers, under a two-step test: first asking whether Congress has directly addressed the precise question at issue, and if the statute is silent or ambiguous, asking only whether the agency's interpretation is a permissible construction of it. The doctrine shaped decades of US regulatory litigation before the Supreme Court overruled it in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024), holding that courts must exercise independent judgment in deciding whether an agency acted within its statutory authority rather than deferring to the agency's own reading.
Facts
Origin Period1984, in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.; overruled 2024 in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. 1 Core PrincipleWhen a statute Congress charged an agency with administering is ambiguous, a reviewing court accepts the agency's interpretation as long as it is a reasonable, permissible reading of the statute, rather than substituting the court's own reading. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
The major questions doctrine operates as a limit on Chevron-style deference to agency interpretation on issues of vast economic and political significance.
In Legal System
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.