Taylor v Caldwell is an 1863 English contract law case, decided by Mr Justice Blackburn of the Court of Queen's Bench, which established the common law doctrine of impossibility, the ancestor of the modern doctrine of frustration. Surrey Gardens Music Hall, which the defendants had contracted to let to the plaintiffs for a series of concerts, burned down before the first concert; Blackburn J held that its continued existence was an implied condition of the contract and that its destruction, the fault of neither party, excused both sides from performance. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingHeld that the continued existence of the music hall was an implied condition essential to the contract, and that its destruction by fire, the fault of neither party, rendered performance impossible and excused both parties from their obligations. 1 Current StatusFoundational; opened the door to the modern doctrine of contract frustration, though the ruling itself was narrow. 1 Case Status
Case Status (category) Connections
Decided By
Source Taylor v Caldwell (Wikipedia)
Established
Source Taylor v Caldwell (Wikipedia)
In Legal System
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Sources
1. Taylor v Caldwell (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLede (case description)
is a landmark English contract law case, with an opinion delivered by Mr Justice Blackburn which established the doctrine of common law impossibility.
Infobox: citations
[1863] EWHC QB J1, (1863) 3 B & S 826, 122 ER 309
Infobox: date decided
6 May 1863
Judgment section (final holding sentence)
Blackburn J thus held that both parties were excused from their obligations under their contract.
Importance section
This ruling, although quite narrow, opened the door for the modern doctrine of contract avoidance by frustration.
Lead
which established the doctrine of common law impossibility
Established: Frustration of Purpose, Importance section (doctrine origin edge)
Until this case, parties to a contract were held to be absolutely bound and a failure to perform was not excused by radically changed circumstances. Instead, the contract was breached, and that gave rise to a claim for damages. This ruling, although quite narrow, opened the door for the modern doctrine of contract avoidance by frustration.
- Decided By: Court of King's Bench (England), Infobox court field: Court of Queen's Bench
In Group: Frustration and Damages Cases, Introduction, sentence 1
Taylor v Caldwell is a landmark English contract law case, with an opinion delivered by Mr Justice Blackburn which established the doctrine of common law impossibility.
View the Source Wikidata: Taylor v Caldwell
Wikidata Q7690211, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.