Decisions on what happens when a contract cannot be performed or is broken: Taylor v Caldwell on the frustration of a contract by the destruction of its subject and Hadley v Baxendale on the limits of recoverable damages. A case belongs here when its cited article describes it as a decision on impossibility or remedies for breach. It excludes cases on formation. Both decisions are English and both are taught in the common law of contract as the origin of a standard rule.
Browse By
Frustration and Damages Cases
Filter Results2 entries
Sources
Hadley v Baxendale (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: Hadley v Baxendale, Introduction, sentence 2Quote, Has Member: Hadley v Baxendale, Introduction, sentence 2
It sets the leading rule to determine consequential damages from a breach of contract: a breaching party is liable for all losses that the contracting parties should have foreseen.
Taylor v Caldwell (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: Taylor v Caldwell, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Taylor v Caldwell, Introduction, sentence 1
Taylor v Caldwell is a landmark English contract law case, with an opinion delivered by Mr Justice Blackburn which established the doctrine of common law impossibility.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.