Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Court

Constitutional Court of Korea

Constitutional Courts

The Constitutional Court of Korea is South Korea's specialized court for constitutional adjudication, with jurisdiction over constitutional complaints, statute review referred by ordinary courts, impeachment trials and the dissolution of political parties. On June 28, 2018, ruling on a consolidated group of petitions led by case number 2011Hun-Ba379, the court found that the Military Service Act's failure to provide any alternative to armed service violated conscientious objectors' freedom of conscience under Article 19 of the Constitution, while separately upholding as constitutional the Act's criminal punishment clause for draft refusal.

Facts
Seat
Seoul 1
Jurisdiction Scope
South Korea's specialized constitutional court, with jurisdiction over constitutional complaints, abstract and concrete statute review, impeachment trials and the dissolution of unconstitutional political parties. 2
Jurisdiction Scope
Jurisdiction Scope (category)
National 1
Connections

Decided

Source Korea Law Information Center Summary of Case 2011Hun-Ba379

Has Member

Kim Sanghwan, Jurists
Source Kim Sanghwan (Wikipedia)

In Legal System

Source Constitutional Court of Korea (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Korea Law Information Center Summary of Case 2011Hun-Ba379
2. Kim, Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal Article on the 2018 Ruling
Kim Sanghwan (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: Kim Sanghwan, Infobox
Quote, Has Member: Kim Sanghwan, Infobox
President of the Constitutional Court of Korea
View the Source
Constitutional Court of Korea (Wikipedia)
In Legal System: Law of South Korea, Wikipedia lead paragraph
Quote, In Legal System: Law of South Korea, Wikipedia lead paragraph
헌법재판소; Hanja: 憲法裁判所) is the constitutional court of South Korea, seated in Jongno, Seoul. Exercising constitution
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.