Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Landmark Case

MacPherson v Buick Motor Co

Tort Law

MacPherson v Buick Motor Co is a 1916 decision of the New York Court of Appeals, written by Judge Benjamin Cardozo, that founded modern American product liability law. MacPherson bought a Buick automobile from a dealer, not from the manufacturer directly, and was injured when a defective wooden wheel collapsed. Buick argued it owed no duty of care because there was no direct contractual relationship, or privity, between it and MacPherson. Cardozo held that a manufacturer of a product reasonably certain to be dangerous if negligently made owes a duty of care to the ultimate user of the product, not merely to the immediate purchaser, effectively abolishing the privity requirement for negligence claims against manufacturers and shaping the law of negligence and product liability across the United States.

Facts
Decision Year
1916 1
Decision Date
1916-03-14 1
Holding
Removed the requirement of privity of contract for duty in negligence actions, so a manufacturer could be held liable to an injured end user with whom it had no direct contractual relationship. 1
Connections

Authored By

Decided By

In Legal System

Sources
1. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Lead section, only sentence
    that removed the requirement of privity of contract for duty in negligence actions.
  • Infobox, DecideDate field
    March 14
  • In Group: Negligence and Strict Liability Tort Cases, Introduction, sentence 1
    MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) is a famous New York Court of Appeals opinion by Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo that removed the requirement of privity of contract for duty in negligence actions.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.