Home›Statutes and Acts›Legal Status›In forceBrowse ByIn forceThis dimension marks whether a statute is still in force, has been amended or has been repealed. Wikipedia notes that statutes are distinguished from "secondary legislation, or regulations," precisely because a statute carries the full force of law until a legislature changes it. Browsing by legal status separates statutes still governing today from those since repealed.FactsIn forceSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsComparisonEra of EmergenceWell-attested1300 CE 1In forceFilter Results9 entriesJurisdictionAllAustralia (Commonwealth) (1)Brazil (1)England (1)India (3)People's Republic of China (1)Worldwide (see Extraterritoriality) (1)Enacted EraAll1624 (1)1876 (1)1955 (1)1975 (1)2005 (3)2006 (1)2020 (1)Legal SystemAllAustralian Law (1)Common Law (1)English Law (1)Indian Legal System (3)Law of Brazil (1)Law of the People's Republic of China (2)Promulgated ByAllNational People's Congress (1)Parliament of Australia (Whitlam government) (1)Parliament of Canada (1)Parliament of England, royal assent of King James I (1)Parliament of India (2)President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (1)Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (1)Group TreeAllBritish Commercial and Intellectual Property Statutes (1)Commonwealth Race, Indigenous and Equality Acts (2)Marriage, Family and Gender Acts (3)Security and Public Order Acts Outside the United States (2)Voting, Campaign and Transparency Acts (1)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 9Anti-Secession LawIn forceHindu Marriage Act, 1955In forceHong Kong National Security LawIn forceIndian ActIn forceLei Maria da PenhaIn forceProtection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005In forceRacial Discrimination Act 1975In forceRight to Information Act, 2005In forceStatute of MonopoliesIn forceSources1. Statute (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaStatute, Etymology sectionQuote, Statute, Etymology sectionThe word appears in use in English as early as the 14th century.View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.