The Gacaca courts were Rwanda's system of community-based transitional justice, established to address the roughly 130,000 people accused in connection with the 1994 genocide, in which between 520,000 and 702,000 people were killed, a caseload that overwhelmed Rwanda's formal justice system. Legally created in 2001 and operating from 2002, the courts became active nationwide by early 2007, drawing their name from the Kinyarwanda word for the short grass on which neighborhood elders traditionally gathered to settle local disputes and restore order and harmony by acknowledging wrongdoing and pursuing justice for victims. The government presented the courts as serving several goals of transitional justice at once: establishing a historical record of the genocide, speeding up trials, ending impunity, encouraging reconciliation among Rwandans, and drawing on local custom to administer justice. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Founding Year Jurisdiction ScopeInternational or Supranational 1 Jurisdiction Scope
Jurisdiction Scope (category) Connections
In Legal System
Source Gacaca court (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
- Also in Geography Atlas: Rwanda, found in there.
Sources
1. Gacaca court (Wikipedia)
Introduction, founding year
Legally established in 2001, the Gacaca courts began conducting trials in 2002 and proliferated throughout the country by early 2007.
Introduction, jurisdiction scope
The Gacaca courts were a system of transitional justice in Rwanda following the 1994 genocide.
In Legal System: Law of Rwanda, Lead section
The Gacaca courts (Kinyarwanda: [ɡɑ.t͡ʃɑ̌ː.t͡ʃɑ]) were a system of transitional justice in Rwanda following the 1994 genocide. 'Gacaca', meaning "short grass" referred to the public space where neighborhood male elders (abagabo) would meet to solve local problems.
View the SourceWikidata: Gacaca court
Wikidata Q1316812, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.