Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Browse By

All Legal Realism

Legal Realism gathers the jurists and legal scholars associated with legal realism and its closely related schools, sociological jurisprudence, the free-law movement and related psychological and interest-based theories of law, the twentieth century movement that challenged formalist accounts of legal reasoning by insisting that judicial decisions are shaped by social fact, policy and the judge's own experience as much as by abstract legal rules. Centered heavily at American law schools such as Yale and Columbia in the 1920s and 1930s, the movement also had close continental counterparts in Europe's sociology of law and free-law scholarship.

Facts
Comparison
Defining Characteristic
Legal realists who held that jurisprudence should emulate natural science and rely on empirical evidence of how judges actually decide cases. 1
Formation Year
1920 CE 1
Sources
1. Legal realism (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Legal realism, lead section
    a naturalistic approach to law; it is the view that jurisprudence should emulate the methods of natural science; that is, it should rely on empirical evidence
  • Legal realism, lead section, 1920s-1930s emergence sentence
    The movement emerged in the United States during the 1920s and 1930s, particularly among federal judges and lawyers in the Roosevelt administration.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.