Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Jurist

John Austin (Legal Philosopher)

Legal Philosophy and Jurisprudence

John Austin was an English legal theorist who posthumously influenced British and American law with an analytical approach to jurisprudence and a theory of legal positivism. He opposed traditional approaches of natural law, arguing against any need for connections between law and morality, and claimed that human legal systems can and should be studied in an empirical, value-free way. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Role
Legal theorist 1
Nationality / Jurisdiction
English 1
Born
1790 1
Died
1859 1
Classification
Field of Law
Legal Philosophy and Jurisprudence 1
Gender
Male 1
Role
Role (category)
Legal Scholar 1
Connections

In Legal System

Source John Austin (Legal Philosopher) (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. John Austin (Legal Philosopher) (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section, opening sentence
    was an English legal theorist who posthumously influenced British and American law with an analytical approach to jurisprudence and a theory of legal positivism
  • Lead section, birth date
    3 March 1790
  • Lead section, death date
    1 December 1859
  • Introduction, nationality
    John Austin was an English legal theorist who posthumously influenced British and American law with an analytical approach to jurisprudence and a theory of legal positivism.
  • Introduction, role
    John Austin was an English legal theorist who posthumously influenced British and American law with an analytical approach to jurisprudence and a theory of legal positivism.
  • In Legal System: English Law, John Austin was an English legal theorist who posthumously influenced British and American law with an analytical approach to jurisprudence and a theory of legal positivism. He opposed tradi
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.