Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri, born around 677 or 678 in Medina and dying in 741 or 742, was a tabi'i Arab jurist and traditionist credited with pioneering the development of the sira-maghazi genre and hadith literature. He served the Umayyad Caliphate as a judge, a tax collector and a tutor to Umayyad princes while continuing his scholarly work, and his traditions appear in roughly 3,500 narrations across the six canonical Sunni hadith collections. His work on the prophetic biography, or maghazi, forms the foundation for surviving biographies of Muhammad, transmitted through his students Ibn Ishaq and Ma'mar ibn Rashid. Later scholars including Malik ibn Anas, Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani regarded him as an unquestioned authority, though his close relationship with the Umayyad court has generated ongoing scholarly debate about possible political influence on his teachings.
Facts
RoleTabi'i Arab jurist and traditionist credited with pioneering the development of sīra-maghazi and hadith literature 1 Place of Death Classification
Field of LawIslamic Law (Sharia and Fiqh) 1 Role
Role (category) In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri (Wikipedia)
WikipediaFull article, gender
Raised in Medina, he studied hadith and maghazi under Medinese traditionists before rising to prominence at the Umayyad court, where he served in a number of religious and administrative positions.
Introduction, role
Ibn Shihab or az-Zuhri, was a tabi'i Arab jurist and traditionist credited with pioneering the development of sīra-maghazi and hadith literature.
Full article, field of law
Zuhri's traditions and fiqh opinions were transmitted by his students and are included in Sunni hadith corpus.
View the Source 2. Wikidata: Ibn Shihab al-Zuhri
Wikidata Q3791575, P570 date of death claim (year)
P570 (date of death): 742
Wikidata Q3791575, P19 place of birth claim
P19 (place of birth): Medina
Wikidata Q3791575, P20 place of death claim
P20 (place of death): Medina
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.