Plessy v Ferguson, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1896, upheld a Louisiana law requiring racially separate railway carriages against a challenge that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection. Homer Plessy, who was one eighth Black under Louisiana law, deliberately sat in a whites-only railway car as part of a planned test case organized by a New Orleans civil rights committee, was arrested, and challenged his conviction. In a 7 to 1 opinion by Justice Henry Billings Brown, the Court held that laws requiring separate facilities for Black and white citizens did not violate the Constitution so long as the facilities were equal, the origin of what came to be called the separate but equal doctrine; Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote alone in dissent that the Constitution is color blind and that the decision would prove as pernicious as the Court's earlier Dred Scott ruling. Separate but equal provided the constitutional foundation for legally enforced racial segregation across the American South for the following fifty eight years. The Supreme Court unanimously overruled Plessy in Brown v Board of Education (1954), holding that separate educational facilities are inherently unequal, and Plessy is treated in American constitutional law today as a clear historical wrong rather than as a live legal question of any kind; this entry states that record plainly, not as one side of a live debate.
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingState laws requiring racially segregated but nominally equal facilities do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the doctrine that came to be known as separate but equal. 1 Current StatusNever explicitly overruled by name, but repudiated as to public education by Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and its later progeny, and is now regarded as de facto overruled. 1 Case Status
Case Status (category)Overruled (in whole or part) 1 Connections
Authored By
Source Plessy v. Ferguson (Wikipedia)
Decided By
In Legal System
Source An Introduction to Comparative LawKonrad Zweigert and Hein Koetz; English translation by Tony Weir
Long-Form Articles
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Sources
1. Plessy v. Ferguson (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationWikipedia 'Decision' section
On May 18, 1896, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 decision against Plessy that upheld the constitutionality of Louisiana's train car segregation laws.
Wikipedia lead section, separate-but-equal doctrine
came to be known as "separate but equal"
Wikipedia 'Legacy' section, de facto overruled
beginning in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education, a series of the Court's later decisions have severely weakened Plessy to the point that it is usually considered de facto overruled
- Authored By: Henry Billings Brown, Infobox majority field: Brown
In Group: Race and Segregation Cases, Introduction, sentence 1
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".
View the Source The Oyez Project
An Introduction to Comparative Law
Konrad Zweigert and Hein Koetz; English translation by Tony Weir, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998In Legal System: Common Law
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.