Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Browse By

All Judicial Review and Basic Structure Cases

Decisions that created or limited the power of courts to strike down laws: Marbury v Madison and the Indian line of Golaknath, Kesavananda Bharati and Minerva Mills on the basic structure of the constitution. A case belongs here when its cited article describes it as a decision on judicial review or on amendments to a constitution. It excludes cases on executive power and federalism. The group follows the line of cases from the first assertion of judicial review to the limits courts later set on amending a constitution.

All Judicial Review and Basic Structure Cases
Filter Results4 entries
Sources
I. C. Golaknath and Others v. State of Punjab and Anothers (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Golaknath v State of Punjab, Introduction, sentences 1-2
Quote, Has Member: Golaknath v State of Punjab, Introduction, sentences 1-2
Golaknath v. State Of Punjab (1967 AIR 1643, 1967 SCR (2) 762), or simply the Golaknath case, was a 1967 Indian Supreme Court case, in which the Court ruled that Parliament could not curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.
View the Source
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Quote, Has Member: Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala, Introduction, sentences 1-3
His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Anr. (Writ Petition (Civil) 135 of 1970), also known as the Kesavananda Bharati judgement, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that outlined the basic structure doctrine of the Indian Constitution.
View the Source
Marbury v. Madison (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Marbury v Madison, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Quote, Has Member: Marbury v Madison, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.
View the Source
Minerva Mills v. Union of India (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: Minerva Mills v Union of India, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Quote, Has Member: Minerva Mills v Union of India, Introduction, sentences 1-3
Minerva Mills Ltd. and Ors. v. Union Of India and Ors. (case number: Writ Petition (Civil) 356 of 1977; case citation: AIR 1980 SC 1789) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that applied and evolved the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution of India.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.