Home›Landmark Cases›Decision Era›By Decade›2010sBrowse By2010sThis dimension groups landmark cases by the era in which they were decided. Wikipedia's own example dates one leading case's description to "1914," when "Canadian jurist Augustus Henry Frazer Lefroy" wrote his account of what makes a case leading. Browsing by decision era lets a visitor compare landmark cases decided in the same period.2010sSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)2010sFilter Results11 entriesLegal SystemAllCivil Law (3)Common Law (2)Indian Legal System (2)Law of Kenya (1)Law of Tanzania (1)Public International Law (2)CourtAllConstitutional Court of Korea (1)Federal Supreme Court of Brazil (1)International Criminal Court (1)Permanent Court of Arbitration (1)Supreme Court of India (2)Supreme Court of Kenya (1)Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (1)United States Supreme Court (2)Authoring JuristAllAnthony Kennedy (2)D. Y. Chandrachud (1)Group TreeAllFree Expression, Religion and Conscience Cases (1)Inter-American, African and Inter-State Dispute Cases (1)International Criminal and War Crimes Trials (1)Privacy, Reproduction and Personal Autonomy Cases (1)Sexual Orientation, Marriage and Workplace Equality Cases (3)Country or JurisdictionAllBrazil (1)India (2)Kenya (1)Netherlands (2)Russia (1)South Korea (1)Tanzania (1)United States (2)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 11ADPF 132 and ADI 4277 (Brazil)2010sCitizens United v Federal Election Commission2010sJehovah's Witnesses Extremism Case (Russia)2010sJustice K.S. Puttaswamy v Union of India2010sMtikila v Tanzania2010sNavtej Singh Johar v. Union of India2010sObergefell v Hodges2010sProsecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo2010sRaila Odinga v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission2010sSouth China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China)2010sSouth Korea Conscientious Objection Case (2018)2010sSourcesR v Oakes (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaContains: R v Oakes, Category placement - in-categoryView the SourceCommonwealth v Tasmania (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaContains: Commonwealth v Tasmania, Category placement - in-categoryView the SourceSouth China Sea Arbitration (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaContains: South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China), Category placement - in-categoryView the SourceGriswold v. Connecticut (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Griswold v. ConnecticutEntick v Carrington (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Entick v CarringtonNavtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of IndiaInternational Military Tribunal for the Far East (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Tokyo Trials (International Military Tribunal for the Far East)Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.