Home›Landmark Cases›Country or Jurisdiction›United StatesBrowse ByUnited StatesThis dimension groups landmark cases by the country or jurisdiction whose courts decided them. Wikipedia notes that "leading case" is commonly used in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth jurisdictions instead of "landmark case", as used in the United States, showing how the very terminology differs by jurisdiction. Browsing this way collects every landmark case from the same country or jurisdiction.United StatesSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)United StatesFilter Results30 entriesDecision EraAll1803 (1)1805 (1)1857 (1)1896 (1)1905 (1)1914 (1)1922 (1)1927 (1)1928 (1)1944 (1)1952 (1)1954 (1)1961 (1)1963 (1)1964 (1)1965 (1)1966 (1)1967 (2)1968 (1)1969 (1)1973 (1)1974 (1)1978 (1)1980 (1)1983 (1)1984 (1)2008 (1)2010 (1)2015 (1)Legal SystemAllCommon Law (21)Law of the United States (9)CourtAllNew York Court of Appeals (1)Supreme Court of the State of New York (1)United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1)United States Supreme Court (27)Authoring JuristAllAnthony Kennedy (2)Antonin Scalia (1)Benjamin N. Cardozo (1)Earl Warren (4)Harry Blackmun (1)Henry Billings Brown (1)Hugo Black (2)John Marshall (1)Lewis F. Powell Jr. (1)Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (2)Roger B. Taney (1)Rufus Wheeler Peckham (1)Tom C. Clark (1)Warren E. Burger (1)William J. Brennan Jr. (1)William O. Douglas (1)Group TreeAllAdministrative Courts and Agency Power Cases (1)Executive Power, Federalism and Limits on Government Cases (2)Free Expression, Religion and Conscience Cases (3)Inter-American, African and Inter-State Dispute Cases (1)Judicial Review and Basic Structure Cases (1)Liberty, Emergency Powers and Social Rights Cases (2)Negligence and Strict Liability Tort Cases (1)Police Powers, Search and Confession Cases (5)Possession and Title Cases (1)Privacy, Reproduction and Personal Autonomy Cases (3)Race and Segregation Cases (6)Regulatory Takings and Estates Cases (1)Right to Counsel and Necessity Cases (1)Sexual Orientation, Marriage and Workplace Equality Cases (1)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 30Brown v Board of EducationUnited StatesBuck v BellUnited StatesChevron USA v Natural Resources Defense CouncilUnited StatesCitizens United v Federal Election CommissionUnited StatesDistrict of Columbia v HellerUnited StatesDred Scott v SandfordUnited StatesFilartiga v Pena-IralaUnited StatesGideon v WainwrightUnited StatesGriswold v. ConnecticutUnited StatesImmigration and Naturalization Service v ChadhaUnited StatesKatz v United StatesUnited StatesKorematsu v United StatesUnited StatesLochner v. New YorkUnited StatesLoving v VirginiaUnited StatesMapp v OhioUnited StatesMarbury v MadisonUnited StatesMiranda v ArizonaUnited StatesNew York Times Co v SullivanUnited StatesObergefell v HodgesUnited StatesPalsgraf v Long Island Railroad CoUnited StatesPennsylvania Coal Co v MahonUnited StatesPierson v PostUnited StatesPlessy v FergusonUnited StatesRegents of the University of California v BakkeUnited StatesRoe v WadeUnited StatesTerry v OhioUnited StatesTinker v Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictUnited StatesUnited States v NixonUnited StatesWeeks v United StatesUnited StatesYoungstown Sheet and Tube Co v SawyerUnited StatesSourcesR v Oakes (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaContains: R v Oakes, Category placement - in-categoryView the SourceCommonwealth v Tasmania (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaContains: Commonwealth v Tasmania, Category placement - in-categoryView the SourceSouth China Sea Arbitration (Wikipedia)tier 2WikipediaContains: South China Sea Arbitration (Philippines v. China), Category placement - in-categoryView the SourceGriswold v. Connecticut (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Griswold v. ConnecticutEntick v Carrington (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Entick v CarringtonNavtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of IndiaInternational Military Tribunal for the Far East (Wikipedia)tier 2Contains: Tokyo Trials (International Military Tribunal for the Far East)Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.