Commonwealth v Tasmania, popularly the Tasmanian Dam Case, is a 1983 decision of the High Court of Australia arising from a dispute over the proposed construction of a hydroelectric dam on the Gordon River in Tasmania. The Tasmanian government supported the project; the federal government opposed it after the area was designated a World Heritage site under the UNESCO World Heritage Convention and passed the World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 to stop construction. A 4-3 majority held that the federal government could validly prohibit the dam under section 51(xxix) of the Australian Constitution, the external affairs power, because the legislation gave effect to Australia's treaty obligations, a ruling that substantially expanded federal power over the states. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingHeld, 4-3, that the federal Parliament could validly enact legislation under the external affairs power, section 51(xxix) of the Australian Constitution, to prohibit construction of the dam, because the World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 was reasonably capable of being considered appropriate and adapted to implement Australia's international treaty obligations under the World Heritage Convention. 2 Current StatusIn force; its broad reading of the external affairs power remains the leading authority for federal implementation of international treaty obligations in Australian constitutional law. 2 Case Status
Case Status (category) Connections
Decided By
Source Commonwealth v Tasmania (Wikipedia)
In Legal System
Source Commonwealth v Tasmania (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Sources
1. Wikidata: Commonwealth v Tasmania
- Wikidata Q5153917, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
- Landmark High Court of Australia external-affairs-power decision, still leading authority; no indication of overruling in source
View the Source2. Commonwealth v Tasmania (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead paragraph - entity-description
Commonwealth v Tasmania (popularly known as the Tasmanian Dam Case) was a significant Australian court case, decided in the High Court of Australia on 1 July 1983.
Lead paragraph - decision-year
decided in the High Court of Australia on 1 July 1983
Significance section - holding
It is now firmly established that under section 51(xxix) of the Australian Constitution the Australian Government has the power to enact legislation that is reasonably capable of being considered appropriate and adapted to fulfill Australia's international legal obligations.
- Significance section - case-status
- In Category: Landmark Cases, Category placement - in-category
- Decided By: High Court of Australia, Lead paragraph - decided-by
- In Legal System: Common Law, Significance section - in-legal-system
In Group: Executive Power, Federalism and Limits on Government Cases, Introduction, sentences 2-3
The case was a landmark decision in Australian constitutional law, and was a significant moment in the history of conservation in Australia. The case centred on the proposed construction of a hydro-electric dam on the Gordon River in Tasmania, which was supported by the Tasmanian government, but opposed by the Australian federal government and environmental groups.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.