Doctrines on responsibility beyond simple negligence: vicarious liability, joint and several liability, qualified immunity, the attractive nuisance doctrine, continuing trespass, intrusion on seclusion, liability for fire, the civil law delict and the doctrine of abuse of rights. A doctrine belongs here when its cited article describes a rule of tortious liability, immunity or nuisance. It excludes negligence and equity.
Browse By
Liability, Immunity and Nuisance Doctrines
Filter Results10 entries
Sources
Rule of sevens (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Rule of sevens, LeadQuote, Has Member: Rule of sevens, Lead
establishes three age brackets for determining a young person's capacity to be responsible for torts and crimes
View the Source Abuse of rights (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Abuse of Rights, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Abuse of Rights, Introduction, sentence 1
In civil law jurisdictions, abuse of rights (also known as Prohibition of Chicane) is the exercise of a legal right only to cause annoyance, harm, or injury to another.
View the Source Attractive Nuisance Doctrine (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Attractive Nuisance Doctrine, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Attractive Nuisance Doctrine, Introduction, sentence 1
The attractive nuisance doctrine applies to the law of torts in some jurisdictions.
View the Source Continuing trespass (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Continuing trespass, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Continuing trespass, Introduction, sentence 1
A continuing trespass is: a wrongful act involving a course of action which is a direct invasion of the rights of another. a trespass in the taking of goods, although without intent to appropriate them, followed by an appropriation, the original trespass being deemed to continue to the time of the appropriation, so that the subsequent appropriation is larceny.
View the Source Delict (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Delict, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Delict, Introduction, sentence 1
Delict (from Latin dēlictum, past participle of dēlinquere ‘to be at fault, offend’) is a term in civil and mixed law jurisdictions whose exact meaning varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction but is always centered on the notion of wrongful conduct.
View the Source Ignis suus (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Ignis suus, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Ignis suus, Introduction, sentence 1
Ignis suus (his fire; Latin), sometimes ignus suus, is a common law principle relating to an occupier's liability over damage caused by the spread of fire.
View the Source Intrusion on seclusion (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Intrusion on seclusion, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Intrusion on seclusion, Introduction, sentence 1
Intrusion on seclusion is one of the four privacy torts created under U.S. common law.
View the Source Joint and several liability (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Joint and several liability, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Joint and several liability, Introduction, sentence 1
Where two or more persons are liable in respect of the same liability, in most common law legal systems they may either be: severally liable, or jointly liable, or jointly and severally liable.
View the Source Qualified Immunity (Wikipedia)
Has Member: Qualified Immunity, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Qualified Immunity, Introduction, sentence 1
Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine in United States law that grants government officials-in the performance of their duties-immunity from prosecution or lawsuits unless the prosecutor or plaintiff shows that the official violated civil or constitutional rights, or acted outside of their scope of authority.
View the Source Vicarious Liability (Wikipedia)
WikipediaHas Member: Vicarious Liability, Introduction, sentence 1Quote, Has Member: Vicarious Liability, Introduction, sentence 1
Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.