Abatement of debts and legacies is a common law doctrine of wills. It holds that when the equitable assets of a deceased person are not sufficient to satisfy all the creditors in full, their debts must abate proportionately and the creditors must accept a dividend. The same applies to legacies when the funds or assets out of which they are payable fall short: they abate in proportion, unless priority is given specially to a particular legacy, and annuities are subject to the same rule as general legacies. The usual order of abatement runs from intestate property, to the residuary of the estate, to general devises, demonstrative devises and specific devises, while non-probate property such as life insurance policies does not abate.
Facts
Classification
Doctrine Category Connections
In Area Of Law
In Legal System
Source Abatement of debts and legacies (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Abatement of debts and legacies
a common law doctrine of wills that holds that when the assets of a deceased person are not sufficient to satisfy fully all the creditors, debts must abate proportionatelyView the Source Abatement of debts and legacies (Wikipedia)
Lead section
Abatement of debts and legacies is a common law doctrine of wills that holds that when the equitable assets of a deceased person are not sufficient to satisfy fully all the creditors, their debts must abate proportionately, and they must accept a dividend.
In Legal System: Common Law, Wikipedia lead sentence
Abatement of debts and legacies is a common law doctrine of wills that holds that when the equitable assets of a deceased person are not sufficient to
In Group: Succession, Family Property and Representation Doctrines, Introduction, sentence 1
Abatement of debts and legacies is a common law doctrine of wills that holds that when the equitable assets of a deceased person are not sufficient to satisfy fully all the creditors, their debts must abate proportionately, and they must accept a dividend.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.