Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Landmark Case

District of Columbia v Heller

Constitutional Rights and Civil Liberties

District of Columbia v Heller is a 2008 decision of the United States Supreme Court that recognized an individual right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment. The District of Columbia banned the possession of handguns in the home and required that any other lawfully owned firearm be kept unloaded and either disassembled or secured with a trigger lock; Dick Heller, a special police officer, challenged the law after the District refused to register a handgun he wished to keep at home. The Court held by a five to four majority that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes such as self defense within the home, and struck down the handgun ban and trigger lock requirement as unconstitutional. The decision was the first time the Supreme Court had squarely held the Second Amendment protects an individual rather than only a collective militia based right.

Facts
Decision Year
2008 2
Decision Date
2008-06-26 2
Holding
It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms-unconnected with service in a militia-for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home. 2
Case Status
Case Status (category)
Controlling Precedent 1
Connections

Authored By

Source District of Columbia v Heller (Wikipedia)

Decided By

In Legal System

In the Other Atlases

Found In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.

Sources
1. Wikidata: District of Columbia v Heller
Source: first Supreme Court case on individual Second Amendment right, still followedView the Source
2. District of Columbia v Heller (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Wikipedia infobox, Decided field
    Decided June 26, 2008
  • Wikipedia infobox, Decided field (year)
    Decided June 26, 2008
  • Wikipedia lead paragraph, holding sentence
    It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms-unconnected with service in a militia-for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home.
  • Authored By: Antonin Scalia, Article text
    The Opinion of the Court, delivered by Justice Scalia
  • In Group: Liberty, Emergency Powers and Social Rights Cases, Introduction, sentence 2
    It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms-unconnected with service in a militia-for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.