Due Process

Lochner is the namesake case for the substantive due process line of reasoning the Due Process doctrine page should read as a discredited episode within, not as the doctrine's current shape.

Maneka Gandhi is the landmark case reading substantive due process into Article 21 of the Indian Constitution despite the framers' deliberate rejection of the phrase.

Miranda enforces due process's privilege against self-incrimination by requiring specific procedural warnings before custodial interrogation.

Both doctrines trace to the same Magna Carta clause and developed along related but distinct lines: due process constrains the state's treatment of a specific person, while the rule of law constrains the state's exercise of power generally.

Entity-backed identity for the doctrine category value this doctrine already carries as an enum fact, resolved to a doctrine entity by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The enum fact itself stays on the entity unchanged.

Civil law systems recognize analogous fair-procedure guarantees under related principles such as the rule of law and the principle of legality, rather than due process as such.

Named here for its documented English and American constitutional lineage. Civil law systems recognize closely analogous fair-procedure guarantees under related principles, including the rule of law and the principle of legality, rather than under the same name.