Law Atlas

How The Law Decides
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Jurist

Miguel Reale

Civil Law Scholars and Codifiers

Miguel Reale was a Brazilian jurist and philosopher who lived from 1910 to 2006. He became a professor at the University of São Paulo in 1941 and served twice as its rector, in 1949 to 1950 and again from 1969 to 1973, also serving as São Paulo state secretary of justice in 1947 and founding the Brazilian Institute of Philosophy in 1949. Reale is best known for his three-dimensional theory of law, which holds that legal systems operate simultaneously on a sociological plane of social facts, an axiological plane of values, and a normative plane of legal rules, with a social fact valued producing a legal standard. He played a major role in drafting Brazil's 2002 Civil Code and took part in constitutional review commissions during Brazil's military period.

Facts
Role
Politician and lawyer 2
Nationality / Jurisdiction
Brazilian 1
Born
1910 1
Birth Date
1910-11-06 1
Birthplace
São Bento do Sapucaí 1
Died
2006 1
Death Date
2006-04-14 1
Place of Death
São Paulo 1
Role
Role (category)
Lawyer 2
Role (category)
Legal Scholar 1
Role (category)
Politician 1
Classification
Field of Law
Legal Philosophy and Jurisprudence 1
Gender
Male 1
FAQs

Why did Miguel Reale say law cannot be studied as only fact or only norm?

Because fact, value and norm are all essential dimensions of law and cannot be sliced apart without losing its legal character.

Reale's three-dimensional theory treats fact, value and norm as three interdependent factors that together make law a social structure that is both value-laden and normative, and he held that all three must always be read against the cultural setting of the society where they appear. Because each is an essential dimension of law, law cannot be cut into slices without damaging the specifically legal character of the inquiry. For that reason his theory seeks the unity of the legal phenomenon rather than a view that reduces it to one element.
Connections

In Legal System

Source Miguel Reale (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Nationality

Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.

Source Miguel Reale (Wikipedia)tier 2
Sources
1. Miguel Reale (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Lead, life dates
    Miguel Reale (6 November 1910-14 April 2006) was a Brazilian jurist, philosopher, academic, politician and poet, known as one of the most important Brazilian jurists and as an exponent of the three-dimensional theory of law.
  • Infobox: birth_place
    São Bento do Sapucaí, São Paulo (state), Brazil
  • Infobox: death_place
    São Paulo, São Paulo (state), Brazil
  • Wikipedia category: Brazilian philosophers of law
    Category:Brazilian philosophers of law
  • Introduction, gender
    He was one of the leaders of Integralism in Brazil and an ideologue of the Brazilian Integralist Action.
  • Introduction
    Miguel Reale (6 November 1910 - 14 April 2006) was a Brazilian jurist, philosopher, academic, politician and poet, known as one of the most important Brazilian jurists and as an exponent of the three-dimensional theory of law.
  • In Legal System: Law of Brazil, Wikipedia lead sentence
    was a Brazilian jurist
View the Source
2. Wikidata: Miguel Reale
  • Wikidata Q2698472, occupation/position claims
    occupation/position claim resolves to: Politician and Lawyer
  • Wikipedia category: Brazilian philosophers of law
  • Wikidata Q2698472, P569 date of birth claim (year)
    P569 (date of birth): 1910
  • Wikidata Q2698472, P569 date of birth claim (full date)
    P569 (date of birth): 1910-11-06
  • Wikidata Q2698472, P570 date of death claim (year)
    P570 (date of death): 2006
  • Wikidata Q2698472, P570 date of death claim (full date)
    P570 (date of death): 2006-04-14
  • Wikidata Q2698472, P19 place of birth claim
    P19 (place of birth): São Bento do Sapucaí
  • Wikidata Q2698472, P20 place of death claim
    P20 (place of death): São Paulo
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.